1) Trash is unseemly

2) Landfills are overburdened

3) The oceans are already filled with things, although some of which make excellent homes for animals, also create an unseemly interruption of nature’s beauty.

4) Man must form the habit of not pillaging every habitat he enters, from burning rain forests to overfishing the seas. His killing of so many of nature’s beautiful creatures is ethically bankrupt.

5) As man begins to raise his consciousness from the level of the animal, his economic and humanitarian policies will improve as well.

6) As man raises his consciousness above the animal level, the overpopulation problem will eventually come under control. As it is, Nature herself will treat man’s numbers as an infestation, and will deal with him as such.
Wars are, by and large, the natural consequence of too many people and too few resources, as well as the programming of an organism that was once dependent on hunting and gathering for survival.

Al Gore maintains a 10,000 square foot mansion in Tennessee. His fuel bill from CO2 producing sources is $30,000 per year. His well publicized use of public air transportation is a lie as well.

President Obama is one of the single most CO2 producers on the planet.

Environmentalists such as John Travolta owns and flies five large jets. His footprint is also huge.

Why the little guy in Poughkeepsie with a 1200 square foot home should jump us and turn down his thermometer to follow these people is a mystery to me.

When the rich start to do as they say, I’ll start to listen. In the meantime, I’m going to assume that the substantial evidence that ALL the planets in our solar system are warming is an indication that man himself has had little impact on climate.

Keep in mind also that the eruption of St. Helens through more CO2 into the atmosphere than all the CO2 ever produced by man.

For all these reasons, I view Copenhagen as less than convincing.