 |
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has created an online guide listing (and grading) cell phones now available in the market, according to radiation safety.
Cell phone radiation is a health and safety issue being raised by consumer and health watch organizations, in view of recent studies associating cell phone radiation and long-term cell phone use with increased “risk for brain and salivary gland tumors.”
Here are the best (least radiation-emitting) cell phones out there:
1. Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) [AT&T]
2. Motorola RAZR V8 [CellularONE]
3. Samsung SGH-t229 [T-Mobile]
4. Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) [AT&T]
5. Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) [AT&T]
6. Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) [CellularONE, T-Mobile]
7. T-Mobile Sidekick [T-Mobile]
8. LG Xenon (GR500) [AT&T]
9. Motorola Karma QA1 [AT&T]
10.Sanyo Katana II [Kajeet]
See the entire list of 1,000 cell phones catalogued for radiation emission at The Environmental Working Group.
Related posts:
- Effects of Cell Phone Radiation and Precautionary Measures An in-depth article on various effects of Cell Phone Radiation...
- Top Cell Phones with HD Video Support HD 1080p video recording is the latest craze for cell...
- Best Cell Phones Under $100 or Less (without contract) Here’s a detailed list(with description) of best cell phones under...
- Drawbacks of large screen cell phones Smartphones have huge market nowadays & there are plenty of...
- Tips to Maximize Resale Value of Old Cell Phones The article describes some important tips to maximize resale value...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
2 responses so far ↓
1 Chocolate-lover // Sep 14, 2009 at 8:14 am
Radioactive phones! When I first read the headline I thought: “I don’t hope they discovered some element in mobile phones that is radio active” But it is about the cell phone radiation. It is strange to see that first the general public was told that there was no risk at all as the amount of radiation would be too low to damage any living organism. But it seems that times have changed…
2 Michael // Sep 14, 2009 at 10:02 am
@Chocolate-lover,
You’re right. The word should have been “radiative” not “radio active” which suggests something related to isotopes and all that. Made the correction, this messed up my url, but couldn’t imagine seeing that mistake permanently plastered on the site.:)
Thanks.